What is changing?
Today, each of these ETFs pays a management fee and separately pays its own operating expenses. A unified fee combines these into a single fee, with the adviser paying most ordinary operating costs from that fee. [Certain costs, such as brokerage, taxes, interest and extraordinary expenses, remain fund expenses.]
Why is J.P. Morgan recommending it?
A single, all-in fee is simpler to understand, more predictable for shareholders, and is the common structure across the ETF industry, making these funds easier to compare with peers.
What does it mean for my investment?
Your ETF’s investment objective, strategy and portfolio managers do not change. What changes is how the fee is structured. The proxy statement shows, fund by fund, how the proposed unified fee compares with current total annual operating expenses.
If the proposal is approved
The unified fee takes effect on or about [date], as described in the proxy statement.
If it is not approved
The ETF continues under its current fee and expense arrangements, and the Board will consider next steps.
Said Simply...
“Instead of a management fee plus separate operating costs, your ETF would pay one all-in fee, the way most ETFs already work. The proxy shows the before-and-after for your fund.”